• Home
  • Sitemap
  • Contact us
Int J Fire Sci Eng Search

CLOSE


Int J Fire Sci Eng > Volume 39(2); 2025 > Article
Roh, Min, and Kong: Performance Evaluation of YOLO-YCbCr Based Smoke Segmentation Method

Abstract

YOLO-YCbCr based smoke segmentation method for fire detection was proposed in this study to enhance smoke segmentation performance with reduction in computational cost. The proposed method consists of the deep learning object detection model, You Only Look Once (YOLO), and the color space-based segmentation model, rule-based YCbCr. YOLO is used to detect smoke objects in the input fire images through bounding boxes. The images in the bounding boxes are characterized based on YCbCr color space and the proposed YCbCr rules derived by considering smoke image characteristics segment smoke region. In order to evaluate the smoke segmentation performance, six different fire incident video data were used. The mean intersection over union (IoU) value of the proposed method was improved by approximately 31.3% and 24.5% respectively when compared to the reference models: YOLO-RGB model and YOLO-CIELAB model. It was found that YOLO significantly reduced the erroneous smoke segmentation and YCbCr rules derived from the smoke color features were effective in the smoke segmentation.

1. Introduction

The number of complex and large-scale fire incidents has been currently increasing, leading to greater human casualties and property losses. To avert fires from escalating into large disasters, early fire detection and suppression are crucial. Consequently, there is a strong focus not only on fire detection technologies but also on identifying and monitoring smoke regions in the initial stage of a fire. In addition, developing smoke segmentation methods is important to provide the evacuation guidance to the occupants. Previously, many researches focused on developing and advancing the fire detection sensors but there are technical limitations due to the narrow sensing range and the malfunctions[1-2]. To overcome these limitations, researches on detecting smoke areas by utilizing color space- based smoke detection models that use smoke color information and deep learning-based image segmentation models are being actively conducted[3-9].
Celik et al.[10] proposed a technique to detect fire and smoke by using RGB, YCbCr, and HSV color spaces. The performance of fire pixel detection was evaluated using a dataset of 332 fire images, achieving a detection rate of 99% and false alarm rate of 4.5%. It was observed that color space-based smoke detection method detected the sky region as smoke owing to its grayish color. Prema et al.[11] proposed a YUV color space-based smoke detection model to reduce the false alarm rate of image-based smoke detection methods. The proposed model consists of three stages: setting candidate smoke areas through YUV color space-based detection rules, analyzing texture using grey level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) for the set areas, and distinguishing between smoke and non-smoke using support vector machine (SVM) for the final smoke area detection. The performance of the proposed model was evaluated by using 12 videos containing smoke and smoke-like objects based on a confusion matrix. True positive, false positive, true negative and false negative were 96.29%, 3.71%, 95.94%, and 1.47%, respectively. In addition to the color space-based smoke segmentation, various studies have been conducted to enhance the smoke detection performance by using deep learning-based segmentation models. Yuan et al.[12] proposed a deep smoke segmentation model based on fully convolutional networks (FCN) with two-path approach, combining coarse global context extraction and fine spatial detail preservation to produce high-quality segmentation masks from blurry smoke images. This approach outperforms the existing smoke detection methods such as FCN-8s, SegNet, Static Map Detection, Text-block FCN, Deeplab v1, and label refinement network (LRN), and the mean intersection over union (IoU) of the proposed model was 71.04%. Zheng et al.[13] proposed a multi-scale segmentation model, . By integrating the Sobel operator, multi-scale convolutional encoder, and additional mechanisms like residual mixing attention and edge segmentation modules, the proposed multi-scale model significantly improves segmentation accuracy, precision, and edge detail. From the performance evaluation, the mean IoU of the proposed model was up to 90.48%, which performed better than existing semantic segmentation models.
Many studies have been conducted on smoke segmentation by using color space-based image processing and deep learning-based image segmentation models. However, there is a lack of the generalized rules in the color space-based models for the accurate smoke segmentations because the fire incidents occurred in various environmental conditions leading to the erroneous segmentations especially in the fire images containing the objects having a color similar to smoke. In addition, the deep learning-based image segmentation models require a large amount of data collection, a time-consuming preprocessing process, high computational performance, and relatively longer computation time for training and inference. Therefore, this study proposes the YOLO-YCbCr based smoke segmentation method to enhance the smoke segmentation performance and to reduce the computational cost. The proposed method uses YCbCr rules for the smoke segmentation derived from the smoke color feature in various fire incident images. In addition, in order to improve the smoke segmentation performance, the object detection model, You Only Look Once (YOLO)-v8, was used to detect the smoke objects in the input fire images, and consequently the proposed YOLO-YCbCr based smoke segmentation method was quantitatively evaluated by using six different real fire incident video data, and compared with that of the reference models: YOLO-CIELAB model and YOLO-RGB model.

2. Material and Methods

2.1 Fire image dataset

To train and validate the YOLO-v8 model for the smoke detection, a dataset comprising 31,100 images depicting various fire scenes including flame and smoke objects was collected. The dataset includes images of outdoor fires such as vehicle fires, urban fires, and wildfires, as well as indoor fires in various buildings. Non-fire images were gathered from diverse environments, including buildings, mountains, urban areas, sunsets, and night scenes. For training and validating the YOLO model for the object detection, 30,500 images were used, consisting of 29,423 fire images and 1,077 non-fire images. These images were divided into training data and validation data in 9:1 ratio to train the model and evaluate its object detection performance during the training phase. The test data for evaluating the performance of the proposed smoke segmentation model consisted of 600 images extracted from six fire incident videos. At the preprocessing step for training the object detection model and evaluating the performance of the proposed smoke segmentation model, bounding boxes were added to the flame and smoke objects in each 640 x 640 RGB input image using Roboflow[14], and ground truth smoke regions on each images were created for the performance evaluation. Figure 1 shows example images from the dataset used for training, including fire and non-fire scenes.

2.2 Conventional color space-based smoke segmentation techniques

Several researches[15-18] have been conducted to detect smoke region in the fire images by using the color spaces. Since CIELAB and RGB color space-based models were good for the separation between smoke and non-smoke regions reported by Lee and Kim[15], these color space-based models were chosen as the reference models for the comparison purpose.
As one of the reference color space models for the smoke segmentation, the CIELAB color space model suggested by Zhao et al.[16] was used in the present study. The image conversion from RGB to the CIELAB color space is described from Eq. (1) to Eq. (8), and the rule to detect smoke regions in the CIELAB color space is given by Eq. (9).
(1)
R=γ(sR255),G=γ(sG255),B=γ(sB255)
(2)
γ(x)={(x+0.0551.055)2.4,x0.04045x12.92,x<0.04045
(3)
[XYZ]γ=[0.4124530.3575800.1804230.2026710.7151600.0721690.0193340.1191930.950227][RGB]
(4)
X=XXn,Y=YYn,Z=ZZn
where, Xn, Yn and Zn are 0.950456, 1 and 1.088754, respectively
(5)
L=116f(Y)-16
(6)
a=500*(f(X)-f(Y))
(7)
b=200*(f(Y)-f(Z))
(8)
f(m)={m13,m>(24116)3841108m+16116,m(24116)3
(9)
smokepixel=(40<L<80)(C=a2+b2<15)
where, L, C, a and b represent lightness, chroma, green-red axis and blue-yellow axis, respectively, in the CIELAB color space.
As another reference color space model, the RGB color space model proposed by Toreyin et al.[17] and Kim[18] was used and the rules are described from Eq. (10) to Eq. (13).
(10)
Cmin=min(R,G,B)
(11)
Cmax=max(R,G,B)
(12)
I=(R+G+B)/3
(13)
smokepixel={                                 (|Cmax-Cmin|<Th1)(|Th2<I<Th3|)(|Th2<I<Th3|)(Cmax=B)(|Cmax-Cmin|<Th4)
where, R, G and B represent the red, green, and blue channels in the RGB color space, respectively. Cmax and Cmin are the maximum and minimum pixel values among the R, G, and B channels. Th1 to Th4 are the respective thresholds.
In addition to the reference models, the YUV color space model suggested by Prema et al.[11] was considered and used to investigate the smoke segmentation characteristics of the color space-based models, and the rules to detect the smoke regions are defined from Eq. (14) to Eq. (17).
(14)
Y=0.299R+0.587G+0.1124B
(15)
U=-0.1687R+0.3313G+0.5B+128
(16)
V=0.5R-0.4187G-0.813B+128
(17)
smokepixel=(|U-128|>60)(|U-V|>40)
where, Y, U and V are luminance and chrominance components of each pixel in the RGB image.
The results of the rule-based smoke region detection using the CIELAB, RGB and YUV color spaces are shown in Figure 2. These models could detect smoke regions from the fire images, but the prediction performance was poor. Especially, it was limited to detect the black-gray colored smoke and the smoke region in the fire images containing the objects having the color features similar to smoke such as white building, sky, etc. It was found that the smoke segmentation performance of the conventional color space-based models is strongly affected by environment color features.

2.3 Proposed YOLO-YCbCr smoke segmentation technique

In this study, a rule-based smoke region detection technique using color spaces was used and the rules were developed to properly detect the smoke region by considering the smoke color features derived from various fire occurrence environments. Deep learning object detection model, YOLO-v8, was applied to crop the bounding box containing the smoke object before doing the smoke segmentation. It could minimize the area of other images inside the bounding box and significantly reduce the erroneous smoke segmentation in the images containing the objects with color information similar to smoke. To optimize the YOLO-v8 model, various hyperparameters were adjusted during training, with the learning rate ranging from 0.01 to 0.001, batch sizes from 16 to 128, and momentum values between 0.9 and 0.999. Additionally, different optimizers, including SGD, Adam, AdamW, Radam, and Nadam, were tested to analyze their impact on model performance. Figure 3 further illustrates the YOLO-YCbCr based smoke segmentation procedure, demonstrating how the trained YOLO-v8 model is utilized to accurately identify and extract smoke regions in various environments.
As shown in Figure 4, the optimized YOLO-v8 model detects the smoke objects on RGB input fire images, the selected regions are cropped and converted into YCbCr image. The conversion formula from RGB to YCbCr is given by Eq. (18).
(18)
[YCbCr]=[0.25680.50410.0979-0.1482-0.92100.43920.4392-0.3678-0.0714][RGB]+[16128128]
where, Y denotes the brightness, Cb and Cr represent the blue-difference chroma component and red-difference chroma component, respectively.
From YCbCr information of the image in the bounding box cropped by YOLO-v8, the YCbCr rules suggested in the present study were applied for the smoke segmentation. These rules were derived by analyzing the Y, Cb, and Cr color characteristics of smoke in various fire occurrence environments to distinguish smoke regions more effectively. Three steps of the YCbCr rules were proposed by considering the color features of smoke occurred at various environments. The proposed rules are shown in Figure 4 and explained as below.
•Step 1: Determine the main color (white-light gray or black-gray) of the smoke in the detected smoke object regions based on the brightness difference between the background image and the bounding box.
•Step 2: Detect the white-light gray smoke region by differentiating other objects having color similar to smoke based on the Y, Cb, and Cr values of the pixels, if the step 1 determines the smoke color to be white-light gray.
•Step 3: Detect the black-gray smoke region by using the Y value of the pixels within the bounding box, if the step 1 determines the smoke color to be black-gray.
After detecting the smoke region in the bounding box, the detected smoke regions are finally marked on the original image.

2.4 Performance evaluation methods

To evaluate the smoke segmentation performance, mean IoU was used, which represents the degree of the similarity between the actual smoke region and the predicted smoke region in an image, as determine by Eq. (19).
(19)
meanIoU[%]=(1Ni=1NPiGiPiGi)×100
where, Pi is the predicted segmentation result of the i-th image, and Gi is corresponding ground truth, and N denotes the number of images in a test dataset.
In addition, a confusion matrix analysis was conducted as shown in Table 1. The IoU values were used to determine true positives (TP) and false negatives (FN); the IoU value of 50% or higher was treated as TP, while the IoU value below 50% was treated as FN. If non-smoke regions were detected as smoke region, it was treated as FP. If non-smoke regions were not detected as smoke region, it was treated as TN. Based on the confusion matrix results, precision, recall, and F1-score were determined to quantitatively evaluate the smoke detection performance, and defined from Eq. (20) to Eq. (22), respectively. The precision represents the ratio of the smoke region predicted correctly to the total smoke regions predicted, and the recall means the correctly predicted smoke region to the total actual smoke regions. The F1-score indicates the harmonic mean of the precision and the recall.
(20)
Precision[%]=TPTP+FP×100
(21)
Recall[%]=TPTP+FN×100
(22)
F1-score[%]=Precision×RecallPrecision+Recall×100

3. Results

3.1 Object detection performance of YOLO

In this study, the YOLO-v8 was used to enhance the smoke segmentation for the color space-based models. A pre-trained YOLO-v8 model was employed, and transfer learning was conducted by using a fire image dataset. Hyperparameters were optimized for the YOLO-v8 model to well detect smoke objects in the fire images. The object detection performance was evaluated by using 600 images extracted from six fire images. As shown in Figure 5, the optimized YOLO-v8 well detected smoke objects and the values of the precision and the recall were approximately 92.4% and 91.9%, respectively. The value of the mean Average Precision (mAP), a performance metric for object detection algorithms, was about 96.7%, indicating high object detection performance. The precision-recall (PR) curve is presented in Figure 5(b).

3.2 Smoke segmentation performance

The performance evaluation of the proposed smoke segmentation model was conducted by using 600 fire images extracted from six different fire incident videos. The segmentation results of the proposed model were compared with those of the YOLO-RGB model and the YOLO-CIELAB model considered as the reference models. To assess the smoke segmentation performance, the IoU values were determined as shown in Table 2. The IoU values of the proposed model range from 48.6% to 80.3%, which are greater than those for the reference models in all test video cases. It was observed that the performance of the color space-based smoke segmentation models is still affected by the fire occurrence environment although the YOLO minimizes the effects of the background color features. Additionally, the mean IoU value about all test images of the proposed model is 68.6%, which is similar to the values of deep learning-based smoke segmentation models conducted by Yuan et al.[12]. The mean IoU values for the YOLO-CIELAB model and the YOLO-RGB model are 37.3% and 44.1%, respectively. When compared with the IoU values for the YOLO-CIELAB model and the YOLO-RGB model, the mean IoU improvements by using the proposed model are 31.3% and 24.5%, respectively. In addition, applying the YOLO to the color space-based models such as CIELAB model and RGB model increased the mean IoU values by 16.9% and 21%, respectively. The performance evaluation results show that identifying the smoke color features characterized by considering various fire occurrence environments is very important for the smoke segmentation. It was also found that applying the YOLO is significantly useful to enhance the smoke segmentation performance for the color space-based segmentation models.
Smoke detection performance was evaluated based on the confusion matrix analysis, and the values of the precision, recall, and F1-score are presented in Figure 6. The results show that the YOLO-YCbCr model outperforms the reference models across all performance metrics. Specifically, the values of the precision, recall, and F1-score for the proposed model are 81%, 79.7%, and 79.8%, respectively. When compared to the YOLO-CIELAB model and the YOLO-RGB model, using the YOLO-YCbCr leads to the improvements in precision by 23.9% and 20.5%, in recall by 27% and 16%, and in F1-score by 28.6% and 20.5%, respectively. It was expected that the proposed smoke segmentation can be applicable in real-time fire detection system because it has good smoke segmentation performance and low computational costs such as low preprocessing time, small model size, and fast inference time. This efficiency, combined with its small size, minimal preprocessing, and low memory usage, makes the YOLO-YCbCr model well-suited for real-time applications. With an FPS of 49.8, it enables fast and reliable smoke detection, ensuring practical deployment in real-time fire detection systems.
The smoke segmentation results for each image were thoroughly analyzed to identify the segmentation characteristics of the proposed model and its problems. Representative segmentation results in each fire incident video are shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8. Figure 7 shows the smoke segmentation results for the white-light gray colored smokes and the segmentation performance of the proposed model performed better than the reference models according to mean IoU values. The mean IoU values of the proposed model, the YOLO-CIELAB model, and the YOLO-RGB model are 53.6%, 56.1%, and 69.1% respectively. In the case of white-light gray smokes presented in Figure 7(a), three smoke segmentation models detected the smoke region with the high IoU value because the smoke in the image is well distinguished from the background objects (or colors). However, in the white-light gray smoke images including other objects having similar color to smoke shown in Figures 7(b) and 7(c), both the YOLO-CIELAB model and YOLO-RGB model detected non-smoke region as smoke. In addition, too bright region of the center of smoke was not detected in the reference models. On the other hand, the proposed smoke segmentation model relatively well predicted the smoke region because the rules by considering both the luminance and the chrominances (blue-difference, red-difference) were used to distinguish the smoke region from the smoke-like object regions after identifying the mean luminance of images as described in Figure 4. Figures 8(a)~8(c) show the smoke segmentation results for the black-gray colored smokes. The YOLO-CIELAB model and the YOLO-RGB model used in this study had poor smoke segmentation performance, and the mean IoU values were 21.1% and 32.2%, respectively. The proposed model well detected the black-gray smoke region by considering the optimized luminance thresholds. The mean IoU value of the proposed model for the fire incidents producing the black-gray smoke was 68.1%, which is greater than that of the reference models. Despite the improved performance, the proposed YOLO-YCbCr model has certain limitations. One major challenge is distinguishing smoke from bounding box containing objects with color similar to smoke. This can result in false positives, where white or gray objects such as buildings, clouds, or bright reflections are misclassified as smoke. Additionally, the proposed model is inherently dependent on YOLO’s detection performance. Since the segmentation process is applied only to regions detected by YOLO, any misdetection or failure to detect smoke at this stage directly impacts the accuracy of the final segmentation. To address these limitations, future improvements should focus on integrating texture-based filtering, motion analysis, or hybrid color space approaches to enhance the robustness of smoke segmentation. Furthermore, improving YOLO’s object detection performance is essential, which can be achieved by training the model on diverse fire incident datasets that include various fire scenarios. While the YOLO-YCbCr model shows higher smoke segmentation performance compared to the reference models, its prediction performance and robustness should be increased to enhance the applicability in the real-time fire detection system. Since the model will be applied to fire surveillance systems, including CCTV and drone-based monitoring systems, it is essential to enhance its detection accuracy, prediction reliability, and overall system robustness. Improving these aspects will ensure more effective and reliable smoke detection, enabling early fire detection and minimizing false alarms in diverse real-world environments. In future studies, the YCbCr rules should be optimized by considering various fire incident images and combined with other novel methods to cope the shortcomings of the color space-based smoke segmentation model. Additionally, the proposed model under practical deployment scenarios, such as integration with intelligent monitoring systems or IoT-based fire detection platforms, should be tested and improved to strengthen its applicability in real-world environments.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the YOLO-YCbCr smoke segmentation method was proposed to enhance the smoke segmentation performance. The quantitative evaluation of the segmentation performance was conducted by using the fire images extracted from the six fire incident videos, and the main findings are as follows.
Applying the deep learning object detection models, YOLO, significantly enhanced the smoke segmentation performance of the color space-based models by minimizing the effects of other objects’ images.
The mean IoU value of the YOLO-YCbCr model suggested in the present study was approximately 68.6%. When compared with the YOLO-CIELAB model and the YOLO-RGB model, the mean IoU enhancements were around 31.3% and 24.5%, respectively.
It was found that identifying the smoke color features determined by considering various fire occurrence environments was useful to enhance the smoke segmentation performance for the color space-based models.
Future research will focus on optimizing the YCbCr rules to enhance the smoke segmentation performance and its robustness by considering specific smoke color feature derived from various fire incident images. In addition, other object identification techniques will be reviewed and added to the present model to cope the smoke-like object region segmentation.

Notes

Author Contributions

Conceptualization. and methodology, J.R. and M.K.; formal analysis and investigation, J.R.; writing-original draft preparation, J.R.; writing-review and editing, M.K.; supervision, M.K. and S.M.; project administration, S.M.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA) grant funded by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (Grant RS-2022-00156237).

Figure 1.
Representative image for train image dataset.
KIFSE-08731639f1.jpg
Figure 2.
Smoke region detection results of existing color space-based models.
KIFSE-08731639f2.jpg
Figure 3.
Smoke segmentation process of the proposed YOLO-YCbCr model.
KIFSE-08731639f3.jpg
Figure 4.
YCbCr rules proposed for the smoke segmentation.
KIFSE-08731639f4.jpg
Figure 5.
(a) Smoke detection results and (b) precision-recall curve of YOLO-v8 and (c) weight loss curve of YOLO-v8.
KIFSE-08731639f5.jpg
Figure 6.
Precision, recall, and F1-score for each segmentation model.
KIFSE-08731639f6.jpg
Figure 7.
Smoke segmentation results at different fire incident videos containing white-light gray smoke.
KIFSE-08731639f7.jpg
Figure 8.
Smoke segmentation results at different fire incident videos containing black-gray smoke.
KIFSE-08731639f8.jpg
Table 1
Confusion Matrix
Predicted
Positive Negative
Actual Positive True Positive (TP) False Negative (FN)
Negative False Positive (FP) True Negative (TN)
Table 2
Mean IoU Result for Each Test Data
YOLO-CIELAB YOLO-RGB Proposed
Mean IoU 45.6% 50.8% 66.4%

References

1. W. Krüll, T. Schultze, R. Tobera and I. Willms, “Analysis of Dust Properties to Solve the Complex Problem of Non-Fire Sensitivity Testing of Optical Smoke Detectors”, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 62, pp. 859-867 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.08.136.
crossref
2. J. Z. Su and G. P. Crampton, “An Experimental Examination of Dead Air Space for Smoke Alarms”, Fire Technology, Vol. 45, pp. 97-115 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-008-0043-y.
crossref
3. D. Xing, Y. Zhongming, W. Lin and L. Jinlan, “Smoke Image Segmentation Based on Color Model”, Journal on Innovation and Sustainability, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 130-138 (2015), https://doi.org/10.24212/2179-3565.2015v6i2p130-138.
crossref
4. Y. Zhao, “Candidate Smoke Region Segmentation of Fire Video Based on Rough Set Theory”, Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vol. 2015, pp. 1(2015), https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/280415.
crossref
5. K. Kikuta, K. T. Murata and Y. Murakami, “A Daytime Smoke Detection Method Based on Variances of Optical Flow and Characteristics of HSV Color on Footage from Outdoor Camera in Urban City”, Fire Technology, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 1427-1452 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-023-01522-4.
crossref
6. H. Wang and Y. Chen, “A Smoke Image Segmentation Algorithm Based on Rough Set and Region Growing”, Journal of Forest Science, Vol. 65, No. 8, pp. 321-329 (2019), https://doi.org/10.17221/34/2019-JFS.
crossref
7. Y. Jia, H. Du, H. Wang, R. Yu, L. Fan, G. Xu and Q. Zhang, “Automatic Early Smoke Segmentation Based on Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks”, Optik, Vol. 193, (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.05.085.
crossref
8. S. Frizzi, M. Bouchouicha, J. M. Ginoux, E. Moreau and M. Sayadi, “Convolutional Neural Network for Smoke and Fire Semantic Segmentation”, IET Image Process, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 634-647 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1049/ipr2.12046.
crossref
9. Z. Han, Y. Tian, C. Zheng and F. Zhao, “Forest Fire Smoke Detection Based on Multiple Color Spaces Deep Feature Fusion”, Forests, Vol. 15, No. 4, (2024), https://doi.org/10.3390/f15040689.
crossref
10. T. Çelik, H. Özkaramanlı and H. Demirel, “Fire and Smoke Detection without Sensors: Image Processing Based Approach”, 15th European Signal Processing Conference, pp. 1794-1798 2007.

11. C. E. Prema, S. S. Vinsley and S. Suresh, “Multi Feature Analysis of Smoke in YUV Color Space for Early Forest Fire Detection”, Fire Technology, Vol. 52, pp. 1319-1342 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-016-0580-8.
crossref
12. F. Yuan, L. Zhang, X. Xia, B. Wan, Q. Huang and X. Li, “Deep Smoke Segmentation”, Neurocomputing, Vol. 357, pp. 248-260 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.05.011.
crossref
13. Y. Zheng, H. Wang, X. Gan and L. Niu, “U2-Net_S Fire Smoke Segmentation Based on Multiscale Edge Fusion Convolutional Encoder and Edge Supervision”, (2023).
crossref
14. Roboflow, https://roboflow.com/annotate (2024).

15. Y. H. Lee and W. H. Kim, “Smoke Color Analysis of the Standard Color Models for Fire Video Surveillance”, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, Vol. 14, No. 9, pp. 4472-4477 (2013), https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2013.14.9.4472.
crossref
16. Z. Zhao, G. Cui, D. Li and Q. Chen, “Video-Based Smoke Detection by Using Motion, Color, and Texture Features”, SPIE 12462, Third International Symposium on Computer Engineering and Intelligent Communications ISCEIC, 12462, 2022.
crossref
17. B. U. Toreyin, Y. Dedeoglu and A. E. Cetin, “Contour Based Smoke Detection in Video Using Wavelets”, 14th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), 1-5 2006.

18. J. H. Kim, “Smoke Detection Method Using LBP in RGB-Contrast-Image, Dept of Electrical and Electronic Information and Communication Engineering”, The Graduate School, Tongmyong University (2015).



ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
Room 906, The Korea Science Technology Center The first building, 22, Teheran-ro 7 Gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Tel: +82-2-555-2450/+82-2-555-2452    Fax: +82-2-3453-5855    E-mail: kifse@hanmail.net                

Copyright © 2026 by Korean Institute of Fire Science and Engineering.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next